From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 301A43858414 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 23:32:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 301A43858414 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=harmstone.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id bg13-20020a05600c3c8d00b003d9712b29d2so13116700wmb.2 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:32:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vUI6hHLQTZsi6tP4FNrkdEIIPE7hLRTdqWBsL60v5r4=; b=cw6z7NY1xoFYLRF4/c8bn7RPr9zJ5Z2LgfGSCUwEaMTgrexvj2+nUhVCM+V/wCGNhE FH58PlqE6PWCZzIfSu/hW94ZBaTktjXbl8U2kXHjP1DJsQvIRqhwI2/zHaq2I7xx/WUZ x7QWYR5tJf15j+PE6C7eh0YEHlVkgR8PBm18OtR4TIUkJueOrnBCqG80+qbOjBGv57jz 3HlOLmSTbQN+P4u4rBtZQF6APSXjoCVj7mEWUCsgPMny5kmDmxP2+XVXix/2ETHEVPCe 6CoeW+IGGGJXq9RvJqyamXYAidaCW26D++2bAhBDZoldoa+ss/wqygO/CSZV/sz/VYGk 2guA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vUI6hHLQTZsi6tP4FNrkdEIIPE7hLRTdqWBsL60v5r4=; b=PyZRin8O2qKwryqpi2oaCz3JHLLKNztpVE4PlCo4Q76ZNeSSjL5JHXEQj/bZ2YaGIC 3Rer2VuGJscemARaGTmogP61/7OVGnoDhpViHfGw7R96z2OS5uaNfi1Cw3rX8DOpujgp qqi+Cc16/RYxUsOlH8JTp9GE/VoJXGmstJj3CMZNOsndczWq98hBM9GarDgcwGp/X3wW iDRfdLIcicYduBLZzrAlmtYdl/u0ySqLQZAWwsfYB29PwirF4uDe09EG9DVCxUf4nEyx TMRO+p3+O78G7AzeIl2HZTvprrN0GgnX/0S5Mkt2H+3D0dgkhTIvPkFltNnKZLoQCy6b As4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kobiFcSQ5VysEd4aVYIB5hCllB4NoRMXrtCKi2uMudOtTelzmGU a4ESJRDgkW2KeCzdBHjb0VwbYDdWQJq20Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsOEAN5IYdq9xmP/N2E9bFokejYQyK2Y4xvRmU6sZSv9meNfbrcWWpyI9Jn7cDcXNqb2X5Haw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4da0:b0:3d2:3a53:2cd6 with SMTP id v32-20020a05600c4da000b003d23a532cd6mr51175943wmp.9.1673393577517; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:8010:64ea:0:8eb8:7eff:fe53:9d5f? ([2a02:8010:64ea:0:8eb8:7eff:fe53:9d5f]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n14-20020a05600c4f8e00b003c6b7f5567csm4050631wmq.0.2023.01.10.15.32.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:32:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: Mark Harmstone Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 23:32:55 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Fix size of external_reloc for pe-aarch64 To: Jan Beulich Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, Tamar.Christina@arm.com, nickc@redhat.com, pinskia@gmail.com, Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com, nightstrike@gmail.com, wej22007@outlook.com, zac.walker@linaro.org, Christophe Lyon References: <20230106012509.7918-1-mark@harmstone.com> <42d1673b-bca4-a4ce-daf2-ae4c24ca923e@arm.com> <3fb4611d-46ee-fe35-748c-238b4d71fff8@suse.com> <5cacce21-6eb9-fd6e-9497-006b076fb171@arm.com> <9af6c55d-c926-bcde-35c3-cb4a92aa3067@harmstone.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Mark Harmstone In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 10/1/23 08:58, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 09.01.2023 19:03, Mark Harmstone wrote: >> You both raise good points. Sorry, I still find mailing list culture very confusing, compared to something like GitHub... it's not at all clear what you're expected to do, who has what authority, etc. I'm not at all certain that I was even expected to resubmit the patches the third time, given it was more or less a trivial rebase. >> >> Jan, I suggest that I push patches 1 and 4-7 with the original messages, and save the two test patches for a later date. Would that be acceptable? > I think so, yes. Looking at just patch 1, its original description was first > talking about the series as a whole. That part would better be omitted. Each > patch's description should speak just for itself. > > Jan Thanks Jan, it's in now. Mark