From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39954-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14603 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2005 00:55:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14146 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 00:55:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 00:55:22 -0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DPrnZ-0001TB-8d
	for binutils@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 02:50:05 +0200
Received: from ool-4356fcdd.dyn.optonline.net ([67.86.252.221])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 02:50:05 +0200
Received: from seandarcy2 by ool-4356fcdd.dyn.optonline.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 02:50:05 +0200
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
From:  sean <seandarcy2@gmail.com>
Subject:  Re: Fwd: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:55:00 -0000
Message-ID: <d4hero$4p6$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <c195ebf70504241112c4e39b4@mail.gmail.com> <20050424182151.GA15499@lucon.org> <d4gqkc$pud$1@sea.gmane.org> <5460e33305042412557e7e0069@mail.gmail.com> <c195ebf705042413547d664977@mail.gmail.com> <c195ebf7050424140435b84b17@mail.gmail.com> <20050424214925.GA18266@lucon.org>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ool-4356fcdd.dyn.optonline.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20041209
In-Reply-To: <20050424214925.GA18266@lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00654.txt.bz2

H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:04:11PM -0400, sean darcy wrote:
> 

> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20297
> 
> Then if you still believe it is a binutils bug, please open a bug
> report at
> 
> http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/
> 
> with a testcase.
> 
This may be bug 19664. If I don't use 
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden it works.

Odd, I thought visibility-inlines-hidden should affect the 
linker.

But what do I know.

sean