From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender-0.a4lg.com [IPv6:2401:2500:203:30b:4000:6bfe:4757:0])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B653858D1E
	for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:54:18 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 90B653858D1E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=irq.a4lg.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=irq.a4lg.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E4E0300089;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:54:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=irq.a4lg.com;
	s=2017s01; t=1663080856;
	bh=wild5R5Gpneqz3pK6aRGQArhiHuNebzS1qUdDZLo+Tw=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:References:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=o2Xo/u0TYwZWRrVZIqKx/xcI4isgT4FuX/FfRIcr1cl/HMp73eZMIUHmfApjvEWyx
	 oAv/KE1n/24i+ycy88yQOzwVsaASijbfZeGx8ijE88smnmI7Lvuk4qp6IiKlD15Q7C
	 X19X4jmR+QxOzRiDlPtAnvvv8Trwy4yACdqGBWYk=
Message-ID: <dd26f6ac-e7d2-2f4e-04cf-f21599c33e1b@irq.a4lg.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 23:54:15 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: alias insn adjustments
Content-Language: en-US
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
References: <7cb92a0b-d1ef-e3db-4773-0b6cd5183272@suse.com>
From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
In-Reply-To: <7cb92a0b-d1ef-e3db-4773-0b6cd5183272@suse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>

On 2022/09/13 21:59, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote:
> 1: re-arrange opcode table for consistent alias handling
> 2: drop stray INSN_ALIAS flags
> 3: add alias for SLLI.UW
> 
> In particular the 3rd patch may want considering to be at least slightly
> RFC.
> 
> Jan
> 

+1 to PATCH 1-2/3 except we can just add -M no-aliases to existing tests
zbkb-32.d and fence-tso.d just like my submission (they don't test any
aliases):

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121674.html

So except that I don't support adding fence-tso-na.d and zbkb-32-na.d,
that's okay.

Tsukasa