From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 435BE3857C69 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:47:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 435BE3857C69 Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-656-VFUjd3WDMu-47fxoubiwdA-1; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 07:47:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: VFUjd3WDMu-47fxoubiwdA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id l34-20020a05600c1d2200b00344d34754e4so1861737wms.7 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:47:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HFcbONA/ACEgNFy7O9SqFehMh29QqarVfi8FiZSCKHc=; b=t+7YAUapStYmAYTzsEa81x3cDQk8UO5suvcgI1l+dwjRnNi86DK7EJfoZRG8PrBRSB xAhZKPQ/2dQkZMhue9Kle0aWbLzdh3OB2ehhoGQpJCIsRVmek0jkWZkpqX1zrGZGi3nv V3EOewqGbp5lHvsb2Irb5HvDSQSCVp27ChbByPcUKU4GlaqT6n1cTFiRKqKIFSb/Xj4k 1auQlVZSGK3CbgIfp0mDcxxuPRQ2rcUcSpSqJC3/RhxioAcb3sQEtbGqSQLE6Puel5da AXJDDtwrsybjVd068VxeIUAgKjZ4m1yVYf9iOb7BeVJmZ/e65WADwZQLQ0lfHcR+e+tR erAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LepxFOZjb79VjBLb04ZeKb9uL6u/rjl7dyQvMb4fxf1M6q+a0 KRIwWlzD+MEG6uxT9M+PFN6F+Pyp2DGRXzRM4xH7M2Mqgdvfccazn4awrAV3nk+ckXh/SlP/yZR DzJN8RAiJWeIZnJtdQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5251:: with SMTP id k17mr4336853wrc.482.1639572458522; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:47:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3iLwV8QHL8xPRGrI+1k0bJIgfZKv57YyxflfCEcO9+3TMW6cl4nkZrYXfJ1KPEiP0vVEVmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5251:: with SMTP id k17mr4336843wrc.482.1639572458344; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:47:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (adsl-164-239.freeuk.com. [80.168.164.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h2sm1856451wrz.23.2021.12.15.04.47.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:47:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:47:37 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] unify 64-bit bfd checks To: Mike Frysinger , binutils@sourceware.org References: <20211204054406.27733-1-vapier@gentoo.org> From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: <20211204054406.27733-1-vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:47:45 -0000 Hi Mike, > Move the 64-bit bfd logic out of bfd/configure.ac and into bfd64.m4 > under config so it can be shared between all the other subdirs. > > This replaces want64 with enable_64_bit_bfd which was already being > declared, but not used directly. Another one that I missed - approved, please apply. Cheers Nick