From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C3C3858D20 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:16:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 40C3C3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673259400; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gKCc6OG22sfqCdZCNc5itgKflAzTxmyUgm6puFzt4LM=; b=YXdJyYMtmjPk26i4ZZFCYLkg19dOtzVLDtTb0BsJqShfcLjBqNnWD0eMuImcUoxJj2VYLp 9saMwGKeYILezOPQmNMJEQ5DcTJkojhK7Un/Gll39lgUgIn0nT66c10IaP98xfOrYY5C7g esmVwGut73HIrePmM+V+PUqJCl1fuzs= Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-82-_Y02zmQWPEqa7Py-1bCuPw-1; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 05:16:38 -0500 X-MC-Unique: _Y02zmQWPEqa7Py-1bCuPw-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id x12-20020a05620a258c00b007051ae500a2so6151156qko.15 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 02:16:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gKCc6OG22sfqCdZCNc5itgKflAzTxmyUgm6puFzt4LM=; b=XnJ8uOc3sPYgypgy1b9an/xIGZ6bWETr+FcEIBwmjwkJ5dib0UE3yHc9iPAHTsSP56 wgiIWzUStVEIFt7CDALNQ+WYpBUDEMQnl7uFD1KpThvH8akHx8+6yHUkvU5iqcq9v0NU 7Yh4WJVQ+4J8tMK+tBUYZ6Hj9CzPBGJAmJ42h/2UFZmjQOBRIDpn7i1z1yntiP0G0REm v9HwUWAI7Uxp5B4lPpx8SN3dlJcymDe9OVEUN4lAmaHX/48vfXWa23bx3C2x9ObLQb2L Ah3JZuQCf0yroQeMYZl8AjbrrpED1LtefspVKXTiC7z7CRHc1x/VHuBeFxIc+OzSoPvs fzEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2koi5/9iEzHWPSByNHjKNh8xj411ZQNGZgTzuMb9VTqvJch09Yfu xWMMed8LcLwMXwMeQEGJx8P8JgX0FJftvLbIsig5YdPEmZvObHeT6Ys4Wo4LAavkskKEhbEUtUi LWqye26HIY0hTdtricw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:fba2:0:b0:531:e436:8e92 with SMTP id m2-20020a0cfba2000000b00531e4368e92mr25936433qvp.22.1673259398128; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 02:16:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtkW38YlTM3rmapPP328PgujXdxlKh5NuySlkLftx2ZEaRBB+1s8dOcgtWVn6HCqnoApfgKXw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:fba2:0:b0:531:e436:8e92 with SMTP id m2-20020a0cfba2000000b00531e4368e92mr25936425qvp.22.1673259397984; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 02:16:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([79.123.71.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j20-20020a05620a289400b006fed58fc1a3sm5140670qkp.119.2023.01.09.02.16.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Jan 2023 02:16:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:16:35 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] libsframe: adjust an incorrect check in flip_sframe To: Indu Bhagat , binutils@sourceware.org References: <20230104065611.377771-1-indu.bhagat@oracle.com> <82fb15dc-4415-63e0-415a-28a875e52458@oracle.com> From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: <82fb15dc-4415-63e0-415a-28a875e52458@oracle.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Indu, > Is this OK for binutils-2_40-branch ? Without this patch, there will be undesirable effects (failing ld SFrame tests, also meaning limited SFrame functionality) in some > cross-builds. Yes - please apply to the branch. Cheers Nick