From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (mail-sender.a4lg.com [153.120.152.154]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FD993858402 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 06:35:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3FD993858402 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sender-0.a4lg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BD94300089; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 06:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:35:04 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] RISC-V: Add 'Smstateen' extension and its CSRs Content-Language: en-US To: Nelson Chu References: Cc: Binutils From: Tsukasa OI In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 06:35:12 -0000 On 2022/02/25 15:32, Nelson Chu wrote: > > The privileged spec doesn't define these CSRs, they are defined and > controlled by smstaeen extension. So I think the defined and aborted > versions of these DECLARE_CSR should be PRIV_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, just > like other unprivileged CSRs did. In the future, they should be > controlled by smstaeen extension versions, but for now we don't need > to care about this. > > Thanks > Nelson Understood. I can fix that soon (including other patches). Thanks, Tsukasa