From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 760933849AC3; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:31:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 760933849AC3 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 760933849AC3 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713886290; cv=none; b=ofK0r2gZsrzsdgRNYVLuiXJF84HDxt6LmyZDDjlD7rFs3qP+AGlcZ9LJb7V8S6wRpM3j4NDyBXYUKv/ZwAfM86MTv8BxvgqEzp1miDrX68MkMcafqexniM3Je6TPq8EkhQKDZ2orbP5gOhG1HXSk/nMGtSLUMzUaMCzjyAg2GL4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713886290; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wO+CcNUhYk4/PyOMaDVfOezzSoxuGnmrSwb5zW5kFTc=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=wy9NKB/2ZLl/W/UqVC3182ICPIbqUV+EfiuON3VlRcEfLZQB2xk4sYMsiJx3PZqqNy4YcfAZqyk1Sog9Hge5dd4ZJ7nnWMoxTZW3BEO754rer8DjGXZ3qkqSPZGXq4TYHmzVNwn7tNAXeA623qVjiuy0xRn+oYWfKuXTzYucC84= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1713886286; bh=wO+CcNUhYk4/PyOMaDVfOezzSoxuGnmrSwb5zW5kFTc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=WwzhA2ZqDjj0Y9qlbfKcHTn5vtQGGeNGIwfGi8VmZWVJNEdc+bdo4qKS8squ+B4w1 2knM6fVDNkEkQl/xvAKBcjEXAZIUimpkx5XpeA05x1kR1flYNGxFJD0BaWZnAtnxun hVtCyc8+N1FsL5AUssVShbBC2BBKu/6vBYZ2Jz1w= Received: from [10.0.0.11] (modemcable238.237-201-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.201.237.238]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E609D1E0AC; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:31:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:31:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Nios2, libbfd: Support new coredump .reg section To: Sandra Loosemore , Luis Machado , =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_Str=C3=BCbe?= , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: "binutils@sourceware.org" References: <20240419103922.3621961-1-moritz.struebe@siemens-energy.com> <31f3077c-2fe1-49c2-b100-d596ab644a22@baylibre.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <31f3077c-2fe1-49c2-b100-d596ab644a22@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2024-04-23 10:51, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 4/23/24 07:28, Luis Machado wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just spotted Sandra's message [1] about nios2 deprecation. >> >> Do we have plans for deprecating such support in binutils/gdb as well, for the >> sake of reducing future maintenance burden? > > Yes, I plan to take care of producing patches to remove the nios2 port entirely from binutils/gdb, as well as from gcc, a little bit farther down the line. I'm not sure of the best timing with respect to upcoming releases, and at the moment I am swamped with other tasks anyway, but it's definitely on my list of things to do -- I don't want to leave this as a pointless maintenance burden for others. > > -Sandra Thanks a lot for being proactive with this. Simon