From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Catherine Moore <clm@codesourcery.com>, binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.0/4 v3] MIPS/GAS: Propagate symbol attributes
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <g439q6uae5.fsf@richards-desktop-2.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012081023090.5345@tp.orcam.me.uk> (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Wed\, 8 Dec 2010 19\:24\:22 +0000 \(GMT\)")
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com> writes:
>> Sorry for not really getting to this patch when you posted the original
>> series. Do you actually have a "real world" use case for this though?
>> Why wouldn't you just put "fnord:" in the appropriate place?
>
> Please note this issue only affects disassembly -- I have not observed
> any other unexpected symptoms. In particular all the relocated entities
> referring to the symbols concerned get the ISA mode set regardless of this
> change.
>
> So it's not about whether we should treat these symbols as MIPS16 code
> references or not, but to match the reality and not mislead the user into
> thinking standard MIPS code is being concerned.
You haven't answered my question, or at least not in a way that
makes me understand it. The testcase in your original message
was a very artificial one, artificial enough that the correct
disassembly is open to debate. Do you have a real-world example
of people writing code like this?
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-09 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 10:48 [PATCH 4/4] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-10-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 4.0/4 v2] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-10-30 10:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2010-12-08 19:24 ` [PATCH 4.0/4 v3] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-12-09 17:25 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2010-12-09 18:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-12-11 0:09 ` [PATCH 4.0/4 v4] MIPS/GAS/testsuite: Branch to self/label tests Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=g439q6uae5.fsf@richards-desktop-2.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com \
--to=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=clm@codesourcery.com \
--cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).