From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21265 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2011 08:49:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 21256 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Apr 2011 08:49:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:48:52 +0000 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so320810wwb.12 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 01:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.151.15 with SMTP id a15mr467055wbw.184.1303807731577; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 01:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richards-thinkpad (gbibp9ph1--blueice2n1.emea.ibm.com [195.212.29.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o23sm2691024wbc.44.2011.04.26.01.48.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 01:48:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Sandiford To: Tristan Gingold Mail-Followup-To: Tristan Gingold ,binutils , Nick Clifton , rdsandiford@googlemail.com Cc: binutils , Nick Clifton Subject: Re: [patch] Convert aix386-core to iso-c References: <49F283B4-757D-4BFF-9FCB-94097A486783@adacore.com> <4DAC3D3A.7090106@redhat.com> <4DB03A7B.4090002@redhat.com> <15BCAB15-09E4-46D0-8653-13589764E066@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15BCAB15-09E4-46D0-8653-13589764E066@adacore.com> (Tristan Gingold's message of "Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:10:23 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 Tristan Gingold writes: > Check by building for i386-ibm-aix. > Gas fails to build because SEG_UNKNOWN is not defined. OK, thanks. > (Should this target be deprecated ?) Sounds like a good plan. Nick? Richard