From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-33189-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30228 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2004 23:25:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30219 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2004 23:25:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (195.135.220.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2004 23:25:02 -0000
Received: from hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2A14D0F95;
	Sun, 25 Apr 2004 01:25:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: demand_empty_rest_of_line and ignore_rest_of_line
References: <40587E7B.10705@codesourcery.com>
	<m3lllzo1vt.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <405979E9.9030805@codesourcery.com>
	<m3n052qw2g.fsf@whitebox.m5r.de>
	<Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241152490.14545@dair.pair.com>
	<jewu45i8gl.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241355010.34988@dair.pair.com>
	<jesmeti651.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241431020.68135@dair.pair.com>
	<jeoephhxlv.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241755510.6786@dair.pair.com>
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
X-Yow: Now KEN is having a MENTAL CRISIS because his "R.V." PAYMENTS are
 OVER-DUE!!
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:37:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0404241755510.6786@dair.pair.com> (Hans-Peter
 Nilsson's message of "Sat, 24 Apr 2004 18:17:36 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <jek705hsc2.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00675.txt.bz2

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> writes:

> On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> writes:
>> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> >> CRIS doesn't as of current gcc mainline, and probably never did.
>> > I assume you mean s/gcc/glibc/?.
>>
>> No.  gcc for cris does not (re-)define TARGET_ASM_FILE_START_APP_OFF, so
>> the assembler never goes into NO_APP mode.
>
> That conclusion is incorrect.  #NO_APP for cris-* is output
> through default_file_start.

You probably mean cris_file_start. Yes, I missed that.

>> > No, at least for a while it (m68k-linux) didn't.  See for
>> > example the gcc-3.3 branch as of Mon Feb 23 18:58:32 GMT 2004.
>>
>> I can't find any relevant changes in this time frame under config/m68k on
>> the 3.3 branch.
>
> I would have expected some #include removals.  You want to look
> at config.gcc too.  Maybe the it was all in the ASM_FILE_START
> revamp anyway.  I compiled and checked but only guessed the
> reason.

I stand corrected.  ASM_FILE_START was redefined in elfos.h, already since
gcc 3.1.

> Note I mentioned the 3.3 branch, where there's
> no TARGET_ASM_FILE_START_APP_OFF.

But it's in 3.4, where it's redefined for all m68k targets.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."