From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-18819-listarch-binutils=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21161 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2002 19:23:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21147 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2002 19:23:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Cantor.suse.de) (213.95.15.193)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2002 19:23:15 -0000
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Charybdis.suse.de [213.95.15.201])
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C9E8A1464C; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 21:23:14 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: sykes.suse.de: schwab set sender to schwab@suse.de using -f
To: Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: copy_private_bfd_data in bfd/elf.c question
References: <200206211526.IAA18732@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
	<jek7osfvfp.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<20020622115652.GI1505@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
X-Yow: We are now enjoying total mutual interaction in an imaginary hot
 tub...
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 12:23:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20020622115652.GI1505@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> (Alan Modra's
 message of "Sat, 22 Jun 2002 21:26:52 +0930")
Message-ID: <jeofe3dso1.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.3.50 (ia64-suse-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00631.txt.bz2

Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> writes:

|> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:28:10PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> writes:
|> > 
|> > |> > How about posting before/after output of readelf -S -l, so we can
|> > |> > have a clue as to what is going on.
|> 
|> Note to Steve: -l not -I !  I was curious as to whether the segment
|> map changed.  If it didn't then no matter.
|> 
|> > |>   [ 4] .hash             HASH            04000620 000620 0000a4 00   A  0   0  8
|> [snip]
|> > |>   [ 4] .hash             HASH            04000620 00061c 0000a4 04   A  2   0  8
|> > 
|> > This seems to be the culprit.
|> 
|> sizeof_hash_entry == 4, so why does this matter?

But align == 8, and addr and off don't agree in the low 3 bits.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."