From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26657 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2012 14:40:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 26647 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2012 14:40:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:39:56 +0000 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAB61800192; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 15:39:54 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: GMMofbaOjcQyKcJ4k30556wMlg2yVLdlXo1ePSm/9MU= Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-153-201.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.153.201]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 48D571C001A5; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 15:39:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 82FFCCA29A; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 15:39:55 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: David Hagood Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Weird error cross-compiling glibc with binutils 2.22 or head References: <34bc660d9f725c71ee7a72236bbdcd1f.squirrel@localhost> <1328313176.2972.16.camel@chumley> <1328357349.2972.20.camel@chumley> X-Yow: Our father who art in heaven.. I sincerely pray that SOMEBODY at this table will PAY for my SHREDDED WHAT and ENGLISH MUFFIN.. and also leave a GENEROUS TIP... Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1328357349.2972.20.camel@chumley> (David Hagood's message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:09:08 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 David Hagood writes: > Except you seem to have missed the bit in my first post that this only > started happening AFTER I replaced the older version of binutils I was > cross-compiling with the newer version of binutils What else did you change in the mean time? There is absolutely nothing of binutils involved when constructing the sed command. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."