From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32305 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2011 18:36:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 32132 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2011 18:36:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:36:11 +0000 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF051C0F58B; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:36:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E86D1C001CF; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:36:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.8.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SI3S0LPrtwPW; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:36:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-103-155.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.103.155]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:36:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4FF91CA2A0; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:36:07 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Ralf Wildenhues Cc: Steve Ellcey , binutils@sourceware.org, "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: PATCH: PR binutils/12283: bfd/doc doesn't support parallel build References: <201101282332.p0SNWFT04949@lucas.cup.hp.com> <20110129094232.GD11288@gmx.de> <1296498781.12233.80.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <20110204063423.GC14132@gmx.de> <1297814811.2267.5.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <20110216050850.GA26163@gmx.de> X-Yow: .. my NOSE is NUMB! Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110216050850.GA26163@gmx.de> (Ralf Wildenhues's message of "Wed, 16 Feb 2011 06:08:50 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2 Ralf Wildenhues writes: > My idea was to clean stamp-chew when $(MKDOC) was cleaned (i.e., in > MOSTLYCLEANFILES). It should not be a problem if the texi files rules' > get triggered for the user of a tarball, because the generated files > should be identical. Even if the rules for the info files get > triggered, they should not be a problem because of the 'missing' script. > But I'd really like to test this well before proposing a new patch. The current dependencies carefully chosen to avoid regenerating the files when no sources are modified and the time stamps are preserved (otherwise you could just depend on $(MKDOC) directly). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."