From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39014-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2891 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2005 16:55:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2873 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2005 16:55:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (205.217.158.180)
  by sourceware.org with QMTP; 22 Mar 2005 16:55:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 28717 invoked by uid 10); 22 Mar 2005 16:55:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 19477 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2005 16:55:14 -0000
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>,
  Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Binutils builds broken with -Werror
References: <20050316201339.GA17575@nevyn.them.org>
	<423E89B0.6000901@redhat.com>
	<wvnu0n56z8a.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<42404C18.5000007@redhat.com>
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:12:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <42404C18.5000007@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <m37jjzhb7x.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00664.txt.bz2

Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> writes:

> Poo.  Well we can rely upon using a GNU-like make program, right ?  So
> how about this version then ?

That's an interesting question.  gcc has decided to require GNU make.
Do the binutils want to follow?

I have no strong opinion on the matter.  GNU make Makefiles can get
pretty horrible pretty fast, but that should be controllable in
principle.

Ian