From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-38340-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14102 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2005 21:11:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14091 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2005 21:11:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (205.217.158.180)
  by sourceware.org with QMTP; 28 Feb 2005 21:11:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 25339 invoked by uid 10); 28 Feb 2005 21:11:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 26187 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2005 21:11:10 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sources.redhat.com,
  bje@au1.ibm.com
To: Ben Elliston <bje@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add more bfd/opncls.c documentation
References: <421BFDA1.7020503@au.ibm.com>
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:27:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <421BFDA1.7020503@au.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <m3acpobdaq.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00712.txt.bz2

Ben Elliston <bje@au1.ibm.com> writes:

> I'm committing the following as obvious, however are bfd_alloc and
> bfd_zalloc really internal functions?  They _do_ appear in libbfd.h.

libbfd.h is where internal functions are declared.

External functions are declared in bfd-in2.h.

Or do you mean that you think bfd_alloc and bfd_zalloc should be
considered to be external functions?  If so, why?

Ian