From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-66582-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10767 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2010 14:36:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 10755 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2010 14:36:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:36:17 +0000
Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6FEaC0E018808	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:36:12 -0400
Received: from hase.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6FEa9gc011991;	Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:36:11 -0400
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: David Stubbs <stubbs@icerasemi.com>, binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
References: <20100421082441.GG3510@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<4D60B0700D1DB54A8C0C6E9BE69163700E7815C7@EXCHANGEVS.IceraSemi.local>	<20100422011106.GI3510@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<20100422015303.GK3510@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<4D60B0700D1DB54A8C0C6E9BE69163700E7F2F15@EXCHANGEVS.IceraSemi.local>	<20100424021750.GQ3510@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<m37hkxxizs.fsf@hase.home>	<20100715130955.GH31087@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<m3lj9cx3gr.fsf@hase.home>	<AANLkTikCxGTUKa9ovu7sqxD6S3dTY766X1WM-oRrm5Ek@mail.gmail.com>	<20100715141753.GI31087@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<AANLkTin6LROD7EYNNjVk6z_lflaoyczHpv6iHzSvGW5s@mail.gmail.com>
X-Yow: TAPPING?  You POLITICIANS!  Don't you realize that the END of the ``Wash Cycle'' is a TREASURED MOMENT for most people?!
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:36:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin6LROD7EYNNjVk6z_lflaoyczHpv6iHzSvGW5s@mail.gmail.com>	(H. J. Lu's message of "Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:26:00 -0700")
Message-ID: <m3d3uox15y.fsf@hase.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2

"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:

> Is that a problem when it isn't included in any segment by
> objcopy/strip?

See <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614382>.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84  5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."