From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1374 invoked by alias); 29 May 2008 23:52:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1366 invoked by uid 22791); 29 May 2008 23:52:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 May 2008 23:52:04 +0000 Received: from zps18.corp.google.com (zps18.corp.google.com [172.25.146.18]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id m4TNppg5006696; Fri, 30 May 2008 00:51:52 +0100 Received: from smtp.corp.google.com (spacemonkey1.corp.google.com [192.168.120.115]) by zps18.corp.google.com with ESMTP id m4TNpo03007514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 May 2008 16:51:51 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (adsl-71-133-8-30.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [71.133.8.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.corp.google.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4TNpn44029149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 May 2008 16:51:50 -0700 To: Kris Van Hees Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH #6407] Patch to resolve issue of non-booting Linux kernel References: <20080529205212.GQ13586@oracle.com> <20080529232715.GR13586@oracle.com> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 13:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20080529232715.GR13586@oracle.com> (Kris Van Hees's message of "Thu\, 29 May 2008 19\:27\:15 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 Kris Van Hees writes: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 04:01:06PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> Kris Van Hees writes: >> >> > 2008-05-29 Kris Van Hees >> > >> > * target-reloc.h (relocate_for_relocatable): Fix new_offset calculation. >> >> Thanks a lot for looking into this. This patch is OK. > > I currently do not have commit privs for binutils. Do you want to check it > in on my behalf? Since it is a pretty small patch I don't think it is right > to request commit privs based on it :) I committed it. Ian