From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-70282-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2670 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2011 16:23:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 2659 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2011 16:23:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:23:01 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1PGMvlr013399	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:22:57 -0500
Received: from hase (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1PGMt9v022587;	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:22:56 -0500
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: David Stubbs <stubbs@icerasemi.com>, binutils@sourceware.org,        Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VMA section overlap warnings for overlays
References: <20100715141753.GI31087@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<AANLkTin6LROD7EYNNjVk6z_lflaoyczHpv6iHzSvGW5s@mail.gmail.com>	<m3d3uox15y.fsf@hase.home>	<AANLkTimsUfwjV0LTKabsdnIhbR1aSFGcJ3VLV8nApK2d@mail.gmail.com>	<m34ofzx4d7.fsf@hase.home>	<20100716093630.GN31087@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<m3tynv7ict.fsf@hase.home>	<20100720054451.GF19525@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<20100720141031.GI19525@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<AANLkTinZVnBqun1qxJHgWiFfYkHWF=XpxGFz2aX65v8B@mail.gmail.com>	<20110225074917.GB5959@bubble.grove.modra.org>	<AANLkTikD3vSv0+VvZFykYCsh7h=kNrH-FGd22QPutwfS@mail.gmail.com>
X-Yow: It don't mean a THING if you ain't got that SWING!!
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:23:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikD3vSv0+VvZFykYCsh7h=kNrH-FGd22QPutwfS@mail.gmail.com>	(H. J. Lu's message of "Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:54:55 -0800")
Message-ID: <m3pqqgkrs0.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2

"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:

> diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dynamic1.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dynamic1.d
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6a8ba55
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/dynamic1.d
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +#ld: -shared -T dynamic1.ld
> +#readelf: -l --wide
> +#target: *-*-linux* *-*-gnu*
> +
> +#...
> + Section to Segment mapping:
> +  Segment Sections...
> +#...
> +   0[1-9]     .dynamic[ 	]*
> +#pass

I don't see how that tests anything, this bug is about objcopy.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84  5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."