From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30902 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 19:59:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 30892 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 19:59:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:59:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7IJvN1O030179; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:57:23 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7IJvMAW005372; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:57:22 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7IJvK7G020124; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:57:20 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 066E23783A9; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:57:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Ralf Wildenhues Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , Dave Korn , binutils@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump References: <4A86E723.3000602@gmail.com> <20090818191404.GB30961__32944.9385325008$1250622877$gmane$org@gmx.de> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090818191404.GB30961__32944.9385325008$1250622877$gmane$org@gmx.de> (Ralf Wildenhues's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:14:04 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00350.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues writes: Ralf> Thanks guys. Does anyone have an up to date git clone of the full src Ralf> tree? If not, are there any volunteers to set one up, or can I bribe Ralf> one? I don't think there is one; AFAIK there are only git trees for a couple parts of src. Ralf> - parts of itcl with 2.61, Ralf> - parts of tk and parts of tcl with 2.60a, My understanding is that gdb changes can be made without worrying about the consequence to the Insight bits, because Insight is not "official" in some way. I would suggest that this also applies to build infrastructure -- IMO it would be ok for you to move forward with the main parts and fix this up later. Ralf> This patch series is almost ready to go otherwise (expect to be able to Ralf> commit this weekend), and it'd be sad to see it hostage of the lesser Ralf> tightly maintained part of the tree. FWIW, I tend to agree. I know this sort of change is very difficult to get in and I think it would be worthwhile to bend the rules a little to make it simpler for you. Tom