From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-36866-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27703 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2004 04:16:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27637 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2004 04:16:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2004 04:16:26 -0000
Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id iBH4EMQ0029628;
	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:14:22 +0100
Received: (from gdr@localhost)
	by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iBH4EMPZ029627;
	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:14:22 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>, hjl@lucon.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix shared library build for libiberty
References: <20041216230100.GA16067@lucon.org>
	<200412170200.iBH20euE027630@greed.delorie.com>
	<20041217020757.GA18875@lucon.org>
	<200412170210.iBH2Afpl027782@greed.delorie.com>
	<87brct8wfx.fsf@codesourcery.com>
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
In-Reply-To: <87brct8wfx.fsf@codesourcery.com>
Organization: Integrable Solutions
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 04:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3wtvh4l41.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2

Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

| DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
| 
| >> I believe libiberty is the only library which uses config/mh-CPUpic
| >> for building shared library. Other libraries use libtool for that,
| >> which doesn't use config/mh-CPUpic.
| >
| > I'd rather libiberty use libtool, then.  Any reason not to?  Would you
| > like to try changing it?
| 
| libtool is evil and must be destroyed, 

Maybe we should avoid describing software (mis)features in the same
terms that God Almighty uses to express His opinion of sacrificing
infants to Moloch.  Whether or not we are making emotional judgements.

semi :-/

-- Gaby