Re: [PATCH] Indicate dependency on personality routines for ARM EHABI

[Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>]

Julian Brown <julian@codesourcery.com> writes:

> Perhaps it should be, and I tried it with that initially. The reason
> it isn't is because elsewhere in tc-arm.c:md_apply_fix3 BFD_RELOC_NONE
> seems to be used as an error indicator:-
> 
>    case BFD_RELOC_NONE:
>    default:
>      as_bad_where (fixP->fx_file, fixP->fx_line,
>                    _("bad relocation fixup type (%d)"), fixP->fx_r_type);
> 
> ...which was being triggered when that relocation type was requested
> with fix_new(), I think. Is there another way around that?

That seems to be a use strictly internal to tc-arm.c, so I would
expect that it can be handled differently in that file.  For example,
perhaps you could use BFD_RELOC_UNUSED, or perhaps you could add a
field to the reloc field of struct arm_it.

Ian