public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: John Marino <binutils@marino.st>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gold linker 2.22 regressed for DragonFly
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mcr4nwe2bmv.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F017A8B.1000905@marino.st> (John Marino's message of "Mon, 02	Jan 2012 10:36:11 +0100")

John Marino <binutils@marino.st> writes:

> On 1/2/2012 3:05 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> John Marino <binutils@marino.st> writes:
>> 
>>> On 12/2/2011 3:27 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>>> John Marino <binutils@marino.st> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> I need to stress that gold built with ld does not have this problem.
>>>>> It's only gold built with gold that segfaults.  Does that affect your
>>>>> answer?
>>>>
>>>> Try using the gold option --no-ctors-in-init-array.
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>
>>> I'm sorry that I had to put this away for a while, but I've picked it
>>> back up today.
>>>
>>> Gold build with ld will function without segfaults and produces executables.
>>> Gold build with gold segfaults.  It ignores all command-line options.
>>>
>>> I modified the makefile to set optimization level to 0.  That let me see
>>> the values of variables in gdb.  Using gdb on ld-new (gold built with
>>> ld), "print options" on gdb shows a properly defined option set of
>>> General_options class.  Doing the same for ld1 (gold built by gold)
>>> shows every single option with null pointers.  Not even strings like
>>> "Report usage information" and "Report version information" are included.
>>>
>>> So the problem lies in options.h within the General_options class.  I
>>> have no idea what ld-new is doing wrong such that ld1 can't built its
>>> option set.  These definitions are built with macros though.
>> 
>> 
>> Did you try using the --no-ctors-in-init-array option?
>> 
>> Ian
>
> Yes, I modified the gold makefile to add that to ld1_LDFLAGS and it
> makes no difference.  The resultant ld1 will still segfault as it tries
> to build ld2.

What linker are you using to build ld1?

You said earlier that gold built with ld does not have a problem.  Only
gold build with gold segfaults.  I am suggesting that you use
--no-ctors-in-init-array when running gold.  In fact you should try just
editing options.h to make --no-ctors-in-init-array the default to see if
that fixes all your problems.

Otherwise, the problem you describe suggests that global constructors
are not running correctly when running gold itself, but I don't know why
that would happen if you are not linking gold itself with gold.

Ian

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-02 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-01 22:16 John Marino
2011-12-02  4:59 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-12-02  8:44   ` John Marino
2011-12-02 14:28     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-12-31 16:40       ` John Marino
2012-01-02  2:05         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-01-02  9:36           ` John Marino
2012-01-02 18:38             ` Ian Lance Taylor [this message]
2012-01-02 19:27               ` John Marino
2012-01-02 19:48                 ` John Marino
2012-01-02 22:56                   ` John Marino
2012-01-03  9:20                     ` gold linker 2.22 regressed for DragonFly [revised testsuite results] John Marino
2012-01-05 18:32                       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-01-06 10:24                         ` John Marino
2012-01-06 14:43                           ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-01-06 20:04                             ` John Marino
2012-01-22 18:59                               ` John Marino
2012-01-22 19:43                                 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-01-22 20:46                                   ` John Marino
2012-01-23 16:49                                     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2012-01-03 19:43                 ` gold linker 2.22 regressed for DragonFly Ian Lance Taylor
2012-01-05 17:30                   ` John Marino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mcr4nwe2bmv.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=iant@google.com \
    --cc=binutils@marino.st \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).