From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9273E3858D33 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:44:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9273E3858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481E020873; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:44:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1675784661; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wNrxMf8y99IRGCKOYuZ4MA9BmfYwGuHKJZJjw34d4Uw=; b=xfTQCMuDnxA9RzwJ0hsPnlE4STLqh89ga8fsa2L7lnYy0xozsKTYoNBa9+kmfz9Pw1e9ug wdnVk4xHZDRNNN5SMixTTqen2lorhHts1LqwNB9NOduIdmZZ4wKdjXbcPq4khSgCSjIORj kmankB3vZt1AU5DOXRTWJ9ZYq5uFM/s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1675784661; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wNrxMf8y99IRGCKOYuZ4MA9BmfYwGuHKJZJjw34d4Uw=; b=V7HDfLHInt8iGwCkZ2xaVejwExHk3djybykBjbFpN6KZUb+fx49xhrlhqkcyA+XEBkOuR8 Yq7csTdAfKdXZ2Dg== Received: from hawking.suse.de (unknown [10.168.4.11]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FC92C141; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hawking.suse.de (Postfix, from userid 17005) id D1DBE442F17; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 16:44:20 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Jan Beulich via Binutils Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Jan Beulich , Fangrui Song Subject: Re: objdump riscv: Stop disassembling addi rd, rs, 0 with a relocation as mv rd, rs? References: <53fa13a4-9828-94a7-b639-991ced5da25b@suse.com> X-Yow: YOW!! Everybody out of the GENETIC POOL! Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 16:44:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <53fa13a4-9828-94a7-b639-991ced5da25b@suse.com> (Jan Beulich via Binutils's message of "Tue, 7 Feb 2023 16:14:47 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Feb 07 2023, Jan Beulich via Binutils wrote: > Could we get away with simply skipping aliases in general when there's a > relocation for an insn? There are aliases with relocatable operands that are not involved in the alias selection. For example, all branch aliases are like that. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."