From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22624 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2008 00:10:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 22615 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2008 00:10:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail3.caviumnetworks.com (HELO mail3.caviumnetworks.com) (12.108.191.235) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:09:58 +0000 Received: from exch4.caveonetworks.com (Not Verified[192.168.16.23]) by mail3.caviumnetworks.com with MailMarshal (v6,2,2,3503) id ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:09:16 -0400 Received: from exch4.caveonetworks.com ([192.168.16.23]) by exch4.caveonetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:09:09 -0700 Received: from localhost ([64.169.86.201]) by exch4.caveonetworks.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:09:09 -0700 To: Thiemo Seufer Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Nick Clifton , Sergey Lapin , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lexra support in binutils References: <18644.12578.173615.825412@foo.home> <1221971049-31412-1-git-send-email-slapin@ossfans.org> <20080924234830.GA18684@build.ossfans.org> <20080929142102.GA2524@build.ossfans.org> <20081014210402.GA14255@build.ossfans.org> <48FF414F.2020206@redhat.com> <20081022201633.GA6450@build.ossfans.org> <49007E9E.8060902@redhat.com> <20081024234325.GB28588@networkno.de> From: Adam Nemet Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20081024234325.GB28588@networkno.de> (Thiemo Seufer's message of "Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:43:25 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 Thiemo Seufer writes: > Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Nick Clifton wrote: >> >> > In fact I would say that the only thing currently missing from your patch is a >> > set of ChangeLog entries for the directories affected by the changes and maybe >> > an entry in the gas/NEWS file mentioning the support for the Lexra. >> >> One minor nit -- it would probably make sense to put the "mips0" entry in >> mips_cpu_info_table[] separately before the list of "Entries for generic >> ISAs," with a one-line comment like: "A fake ISA for MIPS I CPUs without >> unaligned transfers." > > I wonder how this will play with .set mips0. Maybe we should use "mips0.9" > for it, "mips0.8" for the compatible octeon subset, and "mips1.9" for the > R5900. :-) If I understand this correctly, shouldn't octeon be mips64r1.9 then? Adam