From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2797C3858C52 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 23:12:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2797C3858C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Received: from linux-libre.fsfla.org ([2001:470:142:5::54] helo=free.home) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qm0BZ-0002TL-WC; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 19:12:46 -0400 Received: from livre (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by free.home (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 38SNCVpl880830 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 20:12:31 -0300 From: Alexandre Oliva To: "Carlos O'Donell" Cc: Nick Clifton via Binutils , Nick Clifton , ganandan@redhat.com, markobri@redhat.com Subject: Re: Binutils Code of Conduct Organization: Free thinker, not speaking for the GNU Project References: <877cockjm6.fsf@redhat.com> <8b2e929d-e5bf-1e13-3b5e-ced3871246d9@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 20:12:31 -0300 In-Reply-To: <8b2e929d-e5bf-1e13-3b5e-ced3871246d9@redhat.com> (Carlos O'Donell's message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:42:08 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sep 28, 2023, "Carlos O'Donell" wrote: > On 9/28/23 15:27, Alexandre Oliva via Binutils wrote: >> On Sep 26, 2023, Nick Clifton via Binutils wrote: >> >>> We are going to have a Code of Conduct for the GNU Binutils. >> >> This sounds like the decision has already been made. Is that so? Did I >> miss any discussion with volunteer port maintainers like myself, and >> other community members? > I support Nick's decision, and I think it's the right decision to make for the project. It looks like your response was a reaction to my alternate proposal of community governance. Would you be considerate enough to summarize the relevant differences you perceive between the proposals, and justify your preference for one over the other? Otherwise it might seem like you didn't even look. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Think Assange & Stallman. The empires strike back