From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17128 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 17:58:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17097 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 17:58:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) (66.187.233.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 17:58:55 -0000 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (aoliva.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.1.10]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h6THwnK25330; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:58:49 -0400 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [127.0.0.1]) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6THwl9H012391; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:58:47 -0300 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6THwlS1012387; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:58:47 -0300 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, bug-dejagnu@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: wrapper functions that ``call themselves'' break mn10300 -mrelax References: <3F268633.1020704@redhat.com> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F268633.1020704@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00590.txt.bz2 On Jul 29, 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Alex, just an aside. The mn10300 should no longer use those wrapper > functions. This is exactly what the patch I posted fixes :-) Does this mean it's approved for the GDB tree? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer