From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: .cfi_startproc simple
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s1aafb6c.023@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> (raw)
Is it intentional that this directive inherits (rather than clears) the
previous procedure's exit state (namely cur_cfa_offset)? Even if the
expectation is that the user explicitly set the new frame information,
wouldn't it make sense to invalidate the old settings to catch and warn
about uses without setting the basic information? Thanks, Jan
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-29 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-29 10:36 Jan Beulich [this message]
2004-11-29 18:55 ` Richard Henderson
2004-12-14 14:56 Jan Beulich
2004-12-14 23:06 ` Richard Henderson
2004-12-15 16:07 Jan Beulich
[not found] <s1c06118.035@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
2004-12-15 17:35 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s1aafb6c.023@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).