From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-37779-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 22647 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 09:21:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 22303 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 09:21:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com) (195.33.99.129)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 09:21:06 -0000
Received: from EMEA1-MTA by emea1-mh.id2.novell.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:21:06 +0100
Message-Id: <s209d602.093@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:06:00 -0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: .macro behavior
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2

>But apparently there's bug, exposed by the change I asked for.
>I suggest you just hold off on your gas/mmix/relax2.s patch and
>let me handle it, once your patch is in.

So am I getting you right, you want the patch to introduce a new
failure for mmix? That's fine with me (and hopefully with whoever
eventually approves the rest of the patch).

Jan