From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-38133-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21768 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 11:22:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21290 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 11:22:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com) (195.33.99.129)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 11:22:11 -0000
Received: from EMEA1-MTA by emea1-mh.id2.novell.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:22:10 +0100
Message-Id: <s21b15e2.075@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:29:00 -0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,<binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libiberty addition (for binutils): unlink_if_ordinary
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00505.txt.bz2

But the patch is to libiberty, not gcc. And it doesn't seem logical to
throttle other projects because of the current mainline state of gcc...

>>> DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> 21.02.05 19:29:48 >>>

> This patch has been pending for almost a month, and I can't see why
> this can't be applied;

Because gcc is in bugfix-only mode.  This doesn't fix a bug.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-02/msg00079.html