public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
@ 2005-04-01  7:47 Jan Beulich
  2005-04-04 10:45 ` Andreas Jaeger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2005-04-01  7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: aj; +Cc: binutils

Should this also go in the 2.16 branch?

>>> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> 31.03.05 21:51:56 >>>
"Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:

>>>> Andreas Jaeger < aj@suse.de > 29.03.05 21:53:12 >>>
>>"Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
>>
>>> While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
>>> relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
>>> of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.
>>
>>Do you have a testcase?
>
> Attached/below.
>
> Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

This patch is approved,

thanks,
Andreas



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
  2005-04-01  7:47 [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken Jan Beulich
@ 2005-04-04 10:45 ` Andreas Jaeger
  2005-04-04 13:42   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2005-04-04 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: binutils

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 983 bytes --]

"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> writes:

> Should this also go in the 2.16 branch?

This is something the release manager has to approve,

Andreas

>>>> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> 31.03.05 21:51:56 >>>
> "Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
>
>>>>> Andreas Jaeger < aj@suse.de > 29.03.05 21:53:12 >>>
>>>"Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
>>>
>>>> While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
>>>> relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
>>>> of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.
>>>
>>>Do you have a testcase?
>>
>> Attached/below.
>>
>> Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> This patch is approved,
>
> thanks,
> Andreas
>
>
>

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
  2005-04-04 10:45 ` Andreas Jaeger
@ 2005-04-04 13:42   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-04-04 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: Jan Beulich, binutils

On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:44:53PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> writes:
> 
> > Should this also go in the 2.16 branch?
> 
> This is something the release manager has to approve,

This looks appropriate to me; please do.

> 
> Andreas
> 
> >>>> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> 31.03.05 21:51:56 >>>
> > "Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
> >
> >>>>> Andreas Jaeger < aj@suse.de > 29.03.05 21:53:12 >>>
> >>>"Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
> >>>
> >>>> While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
> >>>> relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
> >>>> of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.
> >>>
> >>>Do you have a testcase?
> >>
> >> Attached/below.
> >>
> >> Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> >
> > This patch is approved,
> >
> > thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Andreas
> -- 
>  Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
>   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126



-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
       [not found] <s25a3d28.003@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
@ 2005-04-11 13:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-04-11 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: hjl, binutils, aj

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:02:26AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I would obviously check in an adjusted patch accounting for the
> fundamental problem H.J. had found (and fixed) with it. Awaiting your
> agreement... Jan

If you are confident that the current version of patch+fix is reliable,
then go ahead and move it to 2.16.  Thanks.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
@ 2005-04-11  8:03 Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2005-04-11  8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: drow; +Cc: hjl, binutils, aj

I would obviously check in an adjusted patch accounting for the fundamental problem H.J. had found (and fixed) with it. Awaiting your agreement... Jan

>>> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> 04.04.05 15:42:06 >>>
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:44:53PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> writes:
> 
> > Should this also go in the 2.16 branch?
> 
> This is something the release manager has to approve,

This looks appropriate to me; please do.

> 
> Andreas
> 
> >>>> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> 31.03.05 21:51:56 >>>
> > "Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
> >
> >>>>> Andreas Jaeger < aj@suse.de > 29.03.05 21:53:12 >>>
> >>>"Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
> >>>
> >>>> While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
> >>>> relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
> >>>> of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.
> >>>
> >>>Do you have a testcase?
> >>
> >> Attached/below.
> >>
> >> Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> >
> > This patch is approved,
> >
> > thanks,
> > Andreas
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Andreas
> -- 
>  Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj 
>   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126



-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
@ 2005-03-30 19:09 Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2005-03-30 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: aj; +Cc: binutils

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3121 bytes --]

>>> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> 29.03.05 21:53:12 >>>
>"Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
>
>> While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
>> relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
>> of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.
>
>Do you have a testcase?

Attached/below.

Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Jan

gas/
2005-03-30  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>

	* config/tc-i386.c (md_apply_fix3): Also handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S.
	(tc_gen_reloc): Handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S in the default case.

gas/testsuite/
2005-03-30  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>
	* gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.[sd]: New.
	* gas/i386/i386.exp: Run new test.

--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-14 15:08:07.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-29 15:51:21.258603448 +0200
@@ -4798,6 +4798,7 @@ md_apply_fix3 (fixP, valP, seg)
 	  break;
 
 	case BFD_RELOC_32:
+	case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
 	  fixP->fx_r_type = BFD_RELOC_32_PCREL;
 	  break;
 	case BFD_RELOC_16:
@@ -5361,7 +5362,6 @@ tc_gen_reloc (section, fixp)
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_GOTIE:
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE_32:
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE:
-    case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSGD:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSLD:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_DTPOFF32:
--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp	2005-03-01 08:54:40.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp	2005-03-30 11:05:52.381427528 +0200
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ if [expr ([istarget "i*86-*-*"] || [ista
     run_dump_test "x86_64"
     run_dump_test "x86-64-addr32"
     run_dump_test "x86-64-opcode"
+    run_dump_test "x86-64-pcrel"
     run_dump_test "x86-64-rip"
     run_list_test "x86-64-inval" "-al"
 
--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.d	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.d	2005-03-30 12:04:55.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#objdump: -drw
+#name: x86-64 pcrel
+
+.*: +file format elf64-x86-64
+
+Disassembly of section .text:
+
+0+000 <_start>:
+[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+b0 00[	 ]+movb?[	 ]+\$(0x)?0,%al[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+R_X86_64_PC8[	 ]+xtrn\+(0x)?1
+[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+66 b8 00 00[	 ]+movw?[	 ]+\$(0x)?0,%ax[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+R_X86_64_PC16[	 ]+xtrn\+(0x)?2
+[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+b8 00 00 00 00[	 ]+movl?[	 ]+\$(0x)?0,%eax[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+R_X86_64_PC32[	 ]+xtrn\+(0x)?1
+[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+48 c7 c0 00 00 00 00[	 ]+movq?[	 ]+\$(0x)?0,%rax[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+R_X86_64_PC32[	 ]+xtrn\+(0x)?3
+#pass
--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.s	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.s	2005-03-30 11:54:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+	.text
+_start:
+	movb	$(xtrn - .), %al
+	movw	$(xtrn - .), %ax
+	movl	$(xtrn - .), %eax
+	movq	$(xtrn - .), %rax
+
+	.p2align 4,0



[-- Attachment #2: binutils-mainline-x86_64-pcrel.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2880 bytes --]

While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.

Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Jan

gas/
2005-03-30  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>

	* config/tc-i386.c (md_apply_fix3): Also handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S.
	(tc_gen_reloc): Handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S in the default case.

gas/testsuite/
2005-03-30  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>
	* gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.[sd]: New.
	* gas/i386/i386.exp: Run new test.

--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-14 15:08:07.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-29 15:51:21.258603448 +0200
@@ -4798,6 +4798,7 @@ md_apply_fix3 (fixP, valP, seg)
 	  break;
 
 	case BFD_RELOC_32:
+	case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
 	  fixP->fx_r_type = BFD_RELOC_32_PCREL;
 	  break;
 	case BFD_RELOC_16:
@@ -5361,7 +5362,6 @@ tc_gen_reloc (section, fixp)
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_GOTIE:
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE_32:
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE:
-    case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSGD:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSLD:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_DTPOFF32:
--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp	2005-03-01 08:54:40.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp	2005-03-30 11:05:52.381427528 +0200
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ if [expr ([istarget "i*86-*-*"] || [ista
     run_dump_test "x86_64"
     run_dump_test "x86-64-addr32"
     run_dump_test "x86-64-opcode"
+    run_dump_test "x86-64-pcrel"
     run_dump_test "x86-64-rip"
     run_list_test "x86-64-inval" "-al"
 
--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.d	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.d	2005-03-30 12:04:55.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#objdump: -drw
+#name: x86-64 pcrel
+
+.*: +file format elf64-x86-64
+
+Disassembly of section .text:
+
+0+000 <_start>:
+[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+b0 00[	 ]+movb?[	 ]+\$(0x)?0,%al[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+R_X86_64_PC8[	 ]+xtrn\+(0x)?1
+[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+66 b8 00 00[	 ]+movw?[	 ]+\$(0x)?0,%ax[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+R_X86_64_PC16[	 ]+xtrn\+(0x)?2
+[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+b8 00 00 00 00[	 ]+movl?[	 ]+\$(0x)?0,%eax[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+R_X86_64_PC32[	 ]+xtrn\+(0x)?1
+[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+48 c7 c0 00 00 00 00[	 ]+movq?[	 ]+\$(0x)?0,%rax[	 ]*[0-9a-f]+:[	 ]+R_X86_64_PC32[	 ]+xtrn\+(0x)?3
+#pass
--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.s	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-pcrel.s	2005-03-30 11:54:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+	.text
+_start:
+	movb	$(xtrn - .), %al
+	movw	$(xtrn - .), %ax
+	movl	$(xtrn - .), %eax
+	movq	$(xtrn - .), %rax
+
+	.p2align 4,0

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
  2005-03-29 16:20 Jan Beulich
@ 2005-03-30 10:14 ` Andreas Jaeger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2005-03-30 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: binutils

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1498 bytes --]

"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> writes:

> While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
> relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
> of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.

Do you have a testcase?

Andreas

> Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> Jan
>
> gas/
> 2005-03-29  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>
>
> 	* config/tc-i386.c (md_apply_fix3): Also handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S.
> 	(tc_gen_reloc): Handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S in the default case.
>
> --- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-14 15:08:07.000000000 +0100
> +++ 2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-29 15:51:21.258603448 +0200
> @@ -4798,6 +4798,7 @@ md_apply_fix3 (fixP, valP, seg)
>  	  break;
>  
>  	case BFD_RELOC_32:
> +	case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
>  	  fixP->fx_r_type = BFD_RELOC_32_PCREL;
>  	  break;
>  	case BFD_RELOC_16:
> @@ -5361,7 +5362,6 @@ tc_gen_reloc (section, fixp)
>      case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_GOTIE:
>      case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE_32:
>      case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE:
> -    case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
>      case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSGD:
>      case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSLD:
>      case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_DTPOFF32:
>
>
>

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
@ 2005-03-29 16:20 Jan Beulich
  2005-03-30 10:14 ` Andreas Jaeger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2005-03-29 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1140 bytes --]

While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.

Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Jan

gas/
2005-03-29  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>

	* config/tc-i386.c (md_apply_fix3): Also handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S.
	(tc_gen_reloc): Handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S in the default case.

--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-14 15:08:07.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-29 15:51:21.258603448 +0200
@@ -4798,6 +4798,7 @@ md_apply_fix3 (fixP, valP, seg)
 	  break;
 
 	case BFD_RELOC_32:
+	case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
 	  fixP->fx_r_type = BFD_RELOC_32_PCREL;
 	  break;
 	case BFD_RELOC_16:
@@ -5361,7 +5362,6 @@ tc_gen_reloc (section, fixp)
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_GOTIE:
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE_32:
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE:
-    case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSGD:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSLD:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_DTPOFF32:



[-- Attachment #2: binutils-mainline-x86_64-pcrel.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1104 bytes --]

While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-relative
relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit operands
of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.

Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Jan

gas/
2005-03-29  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>

	* config/tc-i386.c (md_apply_fix3): Also handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S.
	(tc_gen_reloc): Handle BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S in the default case.

--- /home/jbeulich/src/binutils/mainline/2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-14 15:08:07.000000000 +0100
+++ 2005-03-29/gas/config/tc-i386.c	2005-03-29 15:51:21.258603448 +0200
@@ -4798,6 +4798,7 @@ md_apply_fix3 (fixP, valP, seg)
 	  break;
 
 	case BFD_RELOC_32:
+	case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
 	  fixP->fx_r_type = BFD_RELOC_32_PCREL;
 	  break;
 	case BFD_RELOC_16:
@@ -5361,7 +5362,6 @@ tc_gen_reloc (section, fixp)
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_GOTIE:
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE_32:
     case BFD_RELOC_386_TLS_LE:
-    case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_32S:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSGD:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_TLSLD:
     case BFD_RELOC_X86_64_DTPOFF32:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-11 13:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-01  7:47 [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken Jan Beulich
2005-04-04 10:45 ` Andreas Jaeger
2005-04-04 13:42   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
     [not found] <s25a3d28.003@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
2005-04-11 13:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-11  8:03 Jan Beulich
2005-03-30 19:09 Jan Beulich
2005-03-29 16:20 Jan Beulich
2005-03-30 10:14 ` Andreas Jaeger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).