From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39312-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16462 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2005 07:47:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16363 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2005 07:47:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com) (195.33.99.129)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2005 07:47:15 -0000
Received: from EMEA1-MTA by emea1-mh.id2.novell.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 08:47:14 +0200
Message-Id: <s24d0a92.041@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:47:00 -0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: <aj@suse.de>
Cc: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: certain pcrel expressions broken
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2

Should this also go in the 2.16 branch?

>>> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> 31.03.05 21:51:56 >>>
"Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:

>>>> Andreas Jaeger < aj@suse.de > 29.03.05 21:53:12 >>>
>>"Jan Beulich" < JBeulich@novell.com > writes:
>>
>>> While expressions like "sym - ." were correctly converted to use pc-rel=
ative
>>> relocations for 8-, 16-, and 32-bit operations, sign-extended 32-bit op=
erands
>>> of 64-bit operations didn't get converted.
>>
>>Do you have a testcase?
>
> Attached/below.
>
> Built and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

This patch is approved,

thanks,
Andreas