From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39807-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9167 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2005 08:10:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9106 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2005 08:09:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com) (195.33.99.129)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2005 08:09:56 -0000
Received: from EMEA1-MTA by emea1-mh.id2.novell.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:09:55 +0200
Message-Id: <s264cae3.038@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:10:00 -0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
To: <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: gas/config/te-sysv32.h, STRIP_UNDERSCORE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2

>>> Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> 19.04.05 09:42:16 >>>
>On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> How about the now orphaned STRIP_UNDERSCORE then?
>
>If you like, you can remove it.  I think DO_NOT_STRIP can go too, and
>the last arg of symbol_find_base.  Thanks!

Actually, do you think there is a need to keep symbol_find_base then at all=
? All symbol_find now does is call symbol_find_base...

Jan