From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11862 invoked by alias); 11 May 2005 16:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11785 invoked from network); 11 May 2005 16:44:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com) (195.33.99.129) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 May 2005 16:44:11 -0000 Received: from EMEA1-MTA by emea1-mh.id2.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 11 May 2005 17:44:10 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:32:00 -0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: Cc: Subject: Re: QUOTES_IN_INSN Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00401.txt.bz2 >>> Hans-Peter Nilsson 11.05.05 18:37:00 >>> >On Wed, 11 May 2005, Jan Beulich wrote: >> gas/testsuite/ >> 2005-05-11 Jan Beulich >> >> * gas/mmix/err-byte1.s: Don't expect specific error text on line 10. > >Can you explain this, please? Your message said nothing about it. >Briefly, it looks like you introduce a regression in the error >message. What is the exact change in the error output? There are now two messages on the same subject. I simply didn't want to che= ck for both indivually; if you'd rather have me do it that way, I'll do. Th= is appears to be the only testcase that ever cared to check that unterminat= ed strings are caught, which I found kind of surprising... Jan