From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>, hjl@lucon.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:58:00 -0000
Message-id: <u9g0p2vbob.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com>
References: <200007220041.RAA21782@wilson.cygnus.com> <u9r98nuge8.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com> <oraefagbbp.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <u9lmyuvrb2.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com> <org0p2eu9u.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <u9ittyvk80.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com> <orya2ud97f.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
X-SW-Source: 2000-07/msg00409.html

>>>>> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

 > On Jul 22, 2000, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
 >> ...by adding -B$(build_tooldir)/lib/ -isystem $(build_tooldir)/include to
 >> CC_FOR_TARGET, perhaps?  :)

 > Yep.  CC_FOR_TARGET, CXX_FOR_TARGET and any other
 > <compiler>_FOR_TARGET.  Isn't that what H.J.'s patch does?

Yes.  So I'm installing it, along with a whole raft of other changes
brought over from the binutils tree.

Jason