From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1749 invoked by alias); 5 May 2004 06:03:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1732 invoked from network); 5 May 2004 06:03:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 May 2004 06:03:30 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4563UkG010719 for ; Wed, 5 May 2004 02:03:30 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4563Sv01330; Wed, 5 May 2004 02:03:29 -0400 To: libra Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: About ELF and COFF References: <1083725373.4098563db0bdb@webmail.cs.nthu.edu.tw> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 06:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1083725373.4098563db0bdb@webmail.cs.nthu.edu.tw> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 libra writes: > Is there any documentation about ELF is better than COFF? > Which problems the ELF correct that exist with COFF? Take a look at this article: ELF: An Object File to Mitigate Mischievous Misoneism James Q. Arnold USENIX June 1990