From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14436 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2010 21:37:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 14311 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Oct 2010 21:37:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:37:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9ULbjla026003 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:37:45 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-8-165.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.165]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9ULbjpt029935; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:37:45 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id AFE455812A; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:37:44 -0400 (EDT) To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Binutils , GCC Development , GDB Subject: Re: RFC: Add zlib source to src CVS resposity References: From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (H. J. Lu's message of "Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:12:40 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00540.txt.bz2 "H.J. Lu" writes: > [...] By default, the in-tree zlib is used. If you configure > binutis using --with-system-zlib, system zlib will be used. [...] Can you summarize what modern platforms lack a system zlib, and what justifies using the proposed in-tree copy by default? - FChE