From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-25715-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12874 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2003 23:51:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12823 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 23:51:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mms1.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.58)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 23:51:08 -0000
Received: from 63.70.210.1 by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom
 SMTP Relay (MMS v5.5.2)); Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:50:49 -0700
Received: from mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com
 [10.16.128.236]) by mon-irva-11.broadcom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP
 id QAA21068; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com (dt-sj3-118 [10.21.64.118]) by
 mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/SSF) with ESMTP id
 h3SNovov025448; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from cgd@localhost) by dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com (
 8.9.1/SJ8.9.1) id QAA25362; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: amodra@bigpond.net.au
cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: replace mips-*n*bsd in
References: <yov5llxutkcu.fsf@broadcom.com>
 <20030428231547.GD25514@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
 <mailpost.1051571783.9996@news-sj1-1>
From: cgd@broadcom.com
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:51:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: amodra@bigpond.net.au's message of
 "Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:16:23 +0000 (UTC)"
Message-ID: <yov5k7deqizi.fsf@broadcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 12B361D32592786-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00597.txt.bz2

At Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:16:23 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Modra" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 01:53:05PM -0700, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> > I'd like to see the patch below on the trunk and the branch.  This
> > puts the OS names back, for these targets.
> 
> That's fine.

OK, I've taken that as approval-enough.  8-)


> > While i'm all for consolidating, is there any reason to take it that
> > far?!
> 
> To fit them all on one line?  I can't remember why I did it.

Heh.  I know that feeling!


thanks,

chris