From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146F53858D28;
 Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:54:00 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 146F53858D28
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=foss.arm.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=foss.arm.com
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
 by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A1B1042;
 Mon, 18 Jul 2022 02:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.2.78.52] (unknown [10.2.78.52])
 by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07F033F70D;
 Mon, 18 Jul 2022 02:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <0054b9f2-d094-9003-f724-0473a08cc012@foss.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 10:53:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: Arm binutils buildbot workers
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com>
Cc: buildbot@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org
References: <cbfcafcf-bce0-d903-14bd-a2d8f0867a53@arm.com>
 <YtQmECSaFu/Fyuhs@wildebeest.org>
From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <YtQmECSaFu/Fyuhs@wildebeest.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3490.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: buildbot@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The https://builder.sourceware.org/ buildbot"
 <buildbot.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/buildbot>,
 <mailto:buildbot-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/buildbot/>
List-Post: <mailto:buildbot@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:buildbot-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/buildbot>,
 <mailto:buildbot-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:54:01 -0000



On 17/07/2022 16:09, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> If ubuntu-20.04 is an LTS release it might be interesting to have. Is
> it an LTS release for Arm (I am not an Ubuntu user and don't know if
> they officially support something other than x86_64 as LTS release)?
> If not I think just having the latest is better.

For Ubuntu, all .04 releases in even years are LTS releases.  Arm (and 
aarch64) have been supported for several years now.