From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3E8C3858D33 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 20:18:17 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B3E8C3858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=troutmask.apl.washington.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 30VKIGvs056502 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:18:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 30VKICip056501; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:18:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:18:12 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: LIU Hao Cc: Thomas Schwinge , Gerald Pfeifer , Thomas Koenig , Mark Wielaard , Sam James , fortran@gcc.gnu.org, Jerry D , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, buildbot@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master) Message-ID: Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <1985b16e-f17d-bba6-8b57-d372f1741356@gmail.com> <1EC379D7-6EF4-4B27-9D8C-00CFFD115F44@gentoo.org> <1cac0dec-e9c1-e721-52bd-40eb6b8676de@netcologne.de> <976efc37-8d08-a1bd-40d4-e6d9af299697@pfeifer.com> <87zg9yx2xq.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:38:02PM +0800, LIU Hao wrote: > 在 2023-01-31 21:13, Thomas Schwinge 写道: > > Hi! > > > > On 2023-01-30T14:50:08-0800, Steve Kargl via Fortran wrote: > > > Does the skull and crossbones convey anymore info than the rest of > > > the subject line > > > > > > Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master) > > > > They convey as much additional information as does (automated) colorful > > syntax highlighting, or (manual) source code line indentation: "none" to > > some, "a lot" to others. > > > > > > First, I'd argue that 'emoji characters imply spammer' makes little sense. > Everyone can examine the source of all messages in this thread and their > `X-Spam-Status` headers. The fact is that, so far no message had been given > a tag for having emoji/bad/obfuscated characters in its subject. > The irony! Your email ended up in one of my spam folders. X-junkfilter: 20020519 X-Spammer: bodychk-domains: 126.com> domains: 126.com -- Steve