public inbox for buildbot@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: New leap tester fails libabigail build because of too old elfutils version (0.168)
       [not found] <Ypk2bsR62+Ey+IB5@wildebeest.org>
@ 2022-06-02 22:18 ` Mark Wielaard
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mark Wielaard @ 2022-06-02 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: libabigail; +Cc: buildbot

Sorry, mistyped the new buildbot@sourceware.org mailinglist address.
Now correct on CC.

On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 12:15:10AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We added a new opensuse-leap container tester to libabigail:
> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/libabigail-opensuseleap-x86_64
> 
> But it fails the build with:
> 
> abg-dwarf-reader.cc: In function ‘bool abigail::dwarf_reader::is_type_tag(unsigned int)’:
> abg-dwarf-reader.cc:6843:10: error: ‘DW_TAG_coarray_type’ was not declared in this scope
>      case DW_TAG_coarray_type:
>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> abg-dwarf-reader.cc:6843:10: note: suggested alternative: ‘DW_TAG_array_type’
>      case DW_TAG_coarray_type:
>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           DW_TAG_array_type
> abg-dwarf-reader.cc:6845:10: error: ‘DW_TAG_immutable_type’ was not declared in this scope
>      case DW_TAG_immutable_type:
>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> abg-dwarf-reader.cc:6845:10: note: suggested alternative: ‘DW_TAG_volatile_type’
>      case DW_TAG_immutable_type:
>           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           DW_TAG_volatile_type
> 
> DW_TAG_coarray_type and DW_TAG_immutable_type are two new DWARF5 tags,
> not yet defined in libdw-0.168.
> 
> We could workaround that by checking and ignoring or redefining them.
> But even then the testsuite fails various tests. I suspect because
> there are various DWARF5 test files now.
> 
> Does it make sense try to make this work against such an old elfutils version?
> Or should we simply not run a builder with this old an elfutils version?
> 
> elfutils 0.171 was the first version to officially support
> DWARF5. Maybe that should be the minimum version for libabigail now?
> 
> The centos7 builder and debian-old-stable builders have elfutils 0.176
> and are both green:
> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/libabigail-debian-amd64
> https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/libabigail-centos-x86_64
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark
> 
> P.S. There is now a dedicated buildbot@sourceware.org list (CCed) for
>      any questions about the buildbot builders.
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-06-02 22:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <Ypk2bsR62+Ey+IB5@wildebeest.org>
2022-06-02 22:18 ` New leap tester fails libabigail build because of too old elfutils version (0.168) Mark Wielaard

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).