On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:09:19AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:37:58AM +0100, Luis Machado wrote:
> > I always use gdb.base/break.exp as a good smoke test. If that one fails, then things
> > are really broken.
> > 
> > I think gdb.base/break*.exp should make a good smoke test list. We just need to exclude
> > gdb.base/break-interp.exp, which is problematic on some targets.
> 
> It never is just easy is it? :) You are right, I saw break-interp.exp
> fail...  I tried to come up with a regexp but gave up given that it
> has to go throug python first and then we don't know whether the
> worker uses bash as /bin/sh so I just added them all (exclusing
> break-interp.exp) as a list.

Sigh, sorry, looks like gdb.base/break-unload-file.exp also sometimes fails.
I have removed from the list. Hopefully the remaining list does actually pass.

Cheers,

Mark