From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F8E83858C53; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 15:09:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9F8E83858C53 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from reform (deer0x0b.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83199300047C; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:09:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C8882E821DE; Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:09:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:09:04 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Christophe Lyon Cc: buildbot@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Arm binutils buildbot workers Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: buildbot@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "The https://builder.sourceware.org/ buildbot" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 15:09:07 -0000 Hi Christophe, On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:54:53PM +0200, Christophe Lyon via Binutils wrote: > After the GDB builbots, we'd like to add binutils workers for arm64 and > armhf. They will be running in Ubuntu containers like the GDB ones: > https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders?tags=gdb > > At this stage, I'm not sure whether there's interest in having both > ubuntu-20.04 and 22.04? If ubuntu-20.04 is an LTS release it might be interesting to have. Is it an LTS release for Arm (I am not an Ubuntu user and don't know if they officially support something other than x86_64 as LTS release)? If not I think just having the latest is better. > Other question related to binutils: I've noticed there are several buildbot > flavors, with and without --enable-targets=all. The machine is powerful so > we can probably offer to use --enable-targets=all. Does it make sense? Yes for 64bit, unclear for 32bit systems. As far as I understand for 32bit systems --enable-targets=all is broken, but only for sim. So we might have to configure with --enable-targets=all --disable-sim > What's your opinion? Or maybe it would be a better use of the resource as a > try-bot? Could it be both? The idea behind to user try branches is that you can run the buildbot builders as if doing a "real" build. There are not many people using the try branches at the moment, so it isn't really that much more work (also the configuration is simply adding an identifical builder to the try-scheduler). Cheers, Mark