public inbox for bzip2-devel@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "demerphq at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: bzip2-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug bzip2/28904] libbzip2: ‘cost[3]’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:57:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28904-11876-cMo0zDBP0Y@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28904-11876@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904

--- Comment #3 from demerphq <demerphq at gmail dot com> ---
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 00:23, mark at klomp dot org
<sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904
>
> --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> ---
> A different solution might be to use the constant BZ_N_GROUPS instead of the
> variable nGroups when resetting the arrays:
>
> diff --git a/compress.c b/compress.c
> index 5dfa002..2dc5dc1 100644
> --- a/compress.c
> +++ b/compress.c
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ void sendMTFValues ( EState* s )
>     ---*/
>     for (iter = 0; iter < BZ_N_ITERS; iter++) {
>
> -      for (t = 0; t < nGroups; t++) fave[t] = 0;
> +      for (t = 0; t < BZ_N_GROUPS; t++) fave[t] = 0;
>
>        for (t = 0; t < nGroups; t++)
>           for (v = 0; v < alphaSize; v++)
> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ void sendMTFValues ( EState* s )
>              Calculate the cost of this group as coded
>              by each of the coding tables.
>           --*/
> -         for (t = 0; t < nGroups; t++) cost[t] = 0;
> +         for (t = 0; t < BZ_N_GROUPS; t++) cost[t] = 0;
>
>           if (nGroups == 6 && 50 == ge-gs+1) {
>              /*--- fast track the common case ---*/
>
> Which might also help the compiler to simply zero the whole (6 element) arrays
> in one go (the common case), instead of having to check whether nGroups is
> smaller in this particular case.

I am fine with both of your proposals. I was wondering why you don't
use memset() instead of the explicit loop? From what I understand it
is faster.

Yves

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-20  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-18  3:18 [Bug bzip2/28904] New: " demerphq at gmail dot com
2022-04-19 22:04 ` [Bug bzip2/28904] " mark at klomp dot org
2022-04-19 22:23 ` mark at klomp dot org
2022-04-20  1:57 ` demerphq at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-05-26 20:53 ` mark at klomp dot org
2022-05-31 19:06 ` email at arsoftware dot net.br

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-28904-11876-cMo0zDBP0Y@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=bzip2-devel@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).