public inbox for cgen@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Will Newton" <will.newton@imgtec.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: <cgen@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: Constraints between operands
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0D107966AF6D79418315B7C5549F4B5104DFDF@lemail1.le.imgtec.org> (raw)


> > [...]
> > I'm using cgen to write a binutils port for a processor. I've come 
> > across a problem I haven't been able to solve yet with expressing a 
> > constraint between a number of fields in an instruction.
> > [...]
> > ADD D0.1,D0.2 ; Data unit 0 for both regs, OK ADD D0.1,D1.2 ; Data 
> > unit mismatch, error!
> > [...]
> 
> One way may be to write a custom operand parser for the 
> second D slot, which would enforce this constraint.  It would 
> signal a parse error.

I could not see an easy way to reference a previous field. The prototype
of parse handlers is like:

static const char *
parse_hi16 (cd, strp, opindex, valuep)
     CGEN_CPU_DESC cd;                  /* CPU description */
     const char **strp;                 /* Current position in input
text */
     int opindex;                       /* ??? */
     unsigned long *valuep;             /* Result */

In order to find what the previous operand's data unit was the only way
I can see is to rewind strp and parse the input text, which may or may
not work and seems quite nasty. Or is there an easier way?

             reply	other threads:[~2005-09-09  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-09  9:08 Will Newton [this message]
2005-09-21 15:39 ` Doug Evans
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-21 16:03 Will Newton
2005-09-08 13:56 Will Newton
2005-09-08 20:28 ` Frank Ch. Eigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0D107966AF6D79418315B7C5549F4B5104DFDF@lemail1.le.imgtec.org \
    --to=will.newton@imgtec.com \
    --cc=cgen@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).