public inbox for cgen@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
To: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Implementation Language
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 09:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14723.1398.258797.45090@casey.transmeta.com> (raw)

Ben Elliston writes:
 > We've been running CGEN purely interpeted for several months now and no one
 > is finding the speed to be a problem at all.

The smob class implementation is gone too though.
Debugging was much easier with it.
[Of course, for those tuning in late, should the implementation
remain in Guile, yes, we'll want to switch to goops (IMO of course).]

That's probably the first decision we need to reach:
do we stick with Guile?  There's no other politically correct
choice for a Scheme implementation. Or do we switch to C? (/C++?).
[I can here the cackles now ...]

I think speed of code generation is important, but I also think
there's no reason why a Scheme implementation can't satisfy that.
However, I think the current Guile implementation has a _long_ way to go
in this regard, and I'm not convinced it will ever get there.

             reply	other threads:[~2000-07-29  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-07-29  9:26 Doug Evans [this message]
2000-07-31 18:31 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2000-08-01  1:00   ` Ben Elliston
2000-08-02 17:10     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2000-08-03  0:03       ` Ben Elliston
2000-08-03  7:07         ` matthew green
2000-08-03  9:31         ` Doug Evans
2000-08-03  9:49           ` Doug Evans
2000-08-03 16:23             ` Ben Elliston
2000-08-03 18:31               ` Doug Evans
2000-08-03 16:22           ` Ben Elliston
2000-08-05 10:16             ` Doug Evans
2000-08-06 14:52               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2000-08-06 15:27                 ` Ben Elliston
2000-08-07 14:01                 ` Doug Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14723.1398.258797.45090@casey.transmeta.com \
    --to=dje@transmeta.com \
    --cc=bje@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgen@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).