From: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
To: Greg McGary <greg@mcgary.org>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, cgen@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: defining 2-operand version of 3-operand insns?
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 11:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14894.36845.689253.246266@casey.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <msy9xzvgrq.fsf@mcgary.org>
Greg McGary writes:
> > OTOH, I've only seen (f-FIELD VALUE) construct used with
> > literal VALUE arguments.
>
> That appears to be the limitation.
I believe that's the case. Supporting non-literal values
is a left-for-later extension.
> I got this to work by employing a dirty trick. Fortunately,
> the dest and src1 operands are contiguous, so I defined a
> new field that encompasses both, called f-dest2, and used
> encode/decode magic to propagate:
Another way is to have assembler C code do the duplication.
Define a separate version of the operand used by the 2 operand
version and give it special parse/insert/extract/print handlers
(whatever's necessary - you might be able to get away with just a
special insert handler).
[in a later message]
> All of the instructions for which I have 2 & 3 operand versions
> defined as above are excluded from the sim decoder as ambiguous.
> Since the 2-operand versions are exclusively an assembler-language
> convenience, they should be ignored from the simulator.
> Unfortunately, I don't see a `NO-SIM' attribute. Should I add one, or
> is there a better way out of this jam?
ALIAS is the NO-SIM attribute you're looking for.
Since this is an assembler side problem I'd prefer to keep it
out of the simulator too. The ALIAS attribute will do that.
[in another message]
> Doug, does that sound reasonable to you, or are you philosophically
> opposed to the entire 2/3 operand insn hack?
I'm not at all opposed to this. I support it!
[pedantic: as long as it's kept in the assembler side of things and
hacks aren't added to the simulator to support it]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-06 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-01 14:17 Greg McGary
2000-12-01 14:33 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2000-12-01 15:55 ` Greg McGary
2000-12-06 10:29 ` Greg McGary
2000-12-06 10:40 ` Greg McGary
2000-12-06 10:45 ` Doug Evans
2000-12-06 10:42 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2000-12-06 11:13 ` Doug Evans [this message]
2000-12-06 11:26 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2000-12-06 11:51 ` Doug Evans
2000-12-06 11:40 ` Greg McGary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14894.36845.689253.246266@casey.transmeta.com \
--to=dje@transmeta.com \
--cc=cgen@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@mcgary.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).