From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17881 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2002 16:15:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17730 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2002 16:15:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neon-gw.transmeta.com) (63.209.4.196) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2002 16:15:30 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA23223; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:15:27 -0800 Received: from mailhost.transmeta.com(10.1.1.15) by neon-gw.transmeta.com via smap (V2.1) id xma023194; Tue, 19 Mar 02 08:15:00 -0800 Received: from casey.transmeta.com (casey.transmeta.com [10.10.25.22]) by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2JGF0N11011; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:15:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dje@localhost) by casey.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id IAA27131; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:14:59 -0800 From: Doug Evans MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15511.25603.337528.578274@casey.transmeta.com> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:15:00 -0000 To: Hans-Peter Nilsson Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Typo: .substr in pmacros.texi is .substring in pmacros.scm In-Reply-To: <200203191459.PAA10399@ignucius.axis.se> References: <20020128140529.B7787@redhat.com> <200203191459.PAA10399@ignucius.axis.se> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid X-SW-Source: 2002-q1/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 Hans-Peter Nilsson writes: > I didn't see any argument against it, except for the comment in > the code. This works for my simple command-line examples > including the one in the comment but beware of the scheme/CGEN > newbie. (Is this an ok way to compose ChangeLog entries for > nested defines?) btw, do you have an actual use for it? Or is this just something that you think might be useful in the future?