From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22769 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2002 00:31:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22762 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2002 00:31:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neon-gw.transmeta.com) (63.209.4.196) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2002 00:31:44 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA21773; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:31:29 -0700 Received: from mailhost.transmeta.com(10.1.1.15) by neon-gw.transmeta.com via smap (V2.1) id xma021765; Sat, 8 Jun 02 17:31:27 -0700 Received: from casey.transmeta.com (casey.transmeta.com [10.10.25.22]) by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g590VWj18351; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dje@localhost) by casey.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id RAA25065; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:31:31 -0700 From: Doug Evans MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15618.41443.960930.754556@casey.transmeta.com> Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 17:31:00 -0000 To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: pranshu , cgen@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: CGEN Faq-O-Matic In-Reply-To: <20020608172228.A8786@redhat.com> References: <20020608172228.A8786@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-q2/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Frank Ch. Eigler writes: > Hi - > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 12:35:32PM +0530, pranshu wrote: > > hi! > > i'm relatively new to cgen and have beenn trying to simulate a cpu of > > my own.....referring to ur view that the build tree has to be built > > before executing the " make " commands... my problem is ...how > > do i build the tree ? > > [...] > > I believe this means that you (or a higher-level Makefile) must have run > "make all" under the cgen/ directory before running cgen itself to > generate simulator parts. > > Actually, I suspect that this requirement is entirely artificial, > and should be eliminated. Where's pranshu's entire message? Too much has been edited out for me to be confident I understand what the issue is claimed to be.