From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cgen-return-1181-listarch-cgen=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8613 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2002 20:53:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cgen-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cgen/>
List-Post: <mailto:cgen@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cgen-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8599 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 20:53:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neon-gw.transmeta.com) (63.209.4.196)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 20:53:34 -0000
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA24201;
	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:53:30 -0800
Received: from mailhost.transmeta.com(10.1.1.15) by neon-gw.transmeta.com via smap (V2.1)
	id xma024188; Wed, 11 Dec 02 12:53:16 -0800
Received: from xris-athlon.transmeta.com (xris-athlon.transmeta.com [10.10.25.96])
	by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBBKrJR22265;
	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:53:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dje@localhost) by xris-athlon.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id MAA26030; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:53:19 -0800
From: Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15863.42431.712220.698087@xris-athlon.transmeta.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:53:00 -0000
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: strange "a la m32r" comment in cgen-dis.in
In-Reply-To: <20021211151108.B16403@redhat.com>
References: <200212111955.LAA25907@xris-athlon.transmeta.com>
	<20021211151108.B16403@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2

Frank Ch. Eigler writes:
 > Hi -
 > 
 > dje wrote:
 > > I don't understand the "possibly modified" part of this comment.
 > > cgen-dis.in:
 > >   /* Fill in ex_info fields like read_insn would.  Don't actually call
 > >      read_insn, since the incoming buffer is already read (and possibly
 > >      modified a la m32r).  */
 > > Can you elaborate? [...]
 > 
 > I suspect I was referring to the modifications of buf[]
 > in cgen/cpu/m32r.opc (my_print_insn).

Ah.  It's not the buffer that's modified but the pointer.
This is in response to the bug created when read_insn got added.
I'll clean this up.