From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23391 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2002 17:10:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cgen-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cgen-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23383 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2002 17:10:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neon-gw.transmeta.com) (63.209.4.196) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 17:10:49 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA30228; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:10:34 -0800 Received: from mailhost.transmeta.com(10.1.1.15) by neon-gw.transmeta.com via smap (V2.1) id xma030202; Wed, 18 Dec 02 09:10:18 -0800 Received: from casey.transmeta.com (casey.transmeta.com [10.10.25.22]) by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBIHAL328797; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:10:21 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dje@localhost) by casey.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) id JAA05886; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:10:21 -0800 From: Doug Evans MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15872.44029.466573.783431@casey.transmeta.com> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:10:00 -0000 To: Ben Elliston Cc: cgen@sources.redhat.com, hp@axis.com Subject: Re: m32r port breakage In-Reply-To: References: <200212100838.AAA12330@xris-athlon.transmeta.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 Ben Elliston writes: > Doug> Why was @PREFIX@_INSN_MAX replaced with "last instruction enum plus one"? > > A port I was doing had an instruction called "MAX" that generated the > symbol @PREFIX@_INSN_MAX. Rather than change the name of the sentinel > value, I decided to clean this up to avoid any further problems. I > guess I got carried away. :-( Perhaps you could change the sentinel > value's name to @PREFIX@_INSN__MAX? Let's do that.